Nothing much, just moaning.

Getting nicely stuck into my new Giles fic, even though he's about as popular as a Monday morning at the moment so probably no one will read it on principle.

Also slightly ticked at a review just in for The Trio Rides Again on fanfic.net which says, "Hey, it was oh how do you say it...oh yeah...a horrible fic."

It was? Why? If someone goes to the trouble of reviewing, why not put that little bit of extra effort in and make it constructive so I can improve? What made it horrible? The Kennedy bashing? Some people don't hate her as much as I do which is fair enough. Did I make an annoying error in continuity, grammar or spelling? Was it too long, too short, not funny enough, uneven, not true to the characters...

OK, I'm not emotionally attached to Trio; it was a quicky fic, one of the ones I bash out in half an hour, post and that's it, the idea's purged and I can move on, but even so I'd like to know _why_ it was 'horrible'.

Done venting now. Hey, this was very therapeutic! ;-)