I just read this on the Netscape homepage about a New York court ruling against gay marriage:

The decision was 4-2, with the chief justice dissenting. The majority decision was based on the idea that gay couples do not have a demonstrable history of marrying, therefore stopping them from doing so cannot violate their inalienable civil rights.

That is the most disingenuous, patently absurd, circular reasoning ever. Of course they don't; women didn't have a history as enfranchised, slaves in the South didn't have a history of freedom --it doesn't mean I should still be without a vote or legally able to buy another human being.

Things change. Rights do, too, civil or otherwise. I don't believe in basic, inalienable rights; the universe doesn't give them. None of us have a 'right' to life or any of the trimmings; it doesn't work that way. Tell a famine victim that they have a right to be fed and they'll still have an empty belly.

But when we, as a species, recognise an injustice, it's down to us for the sake of our own self-respect, to do what we can to make it better, make it fair.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Profile

janedavitt: (Default)
janedavitt

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags