![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Guess where I'll be at 7.00 p.m. Dec 13th? Watching The Hobbit! David's company have booked the cinema for a pre-showing, tickets ten dollars.
I'm rolling my eyes that it's a trilogy and wishing PJ had simply done one movie and stuck to the book, but still so excited. Weird that in a lot of Europe, that IS the release day, or even the 12th, but in Canada/US it's the 14th. Even allowing for datelines, that's strangely staggered.
I'm rolling my eyes that it's a trilogy and wishing PJ had simply done one movie and stuck to the book, but still so excited. Weird that in a lot of Europe, that IS the release day, or even the 12th, but in Canada/US it's the 14th. Even allowing for datelines, that's strangely staggered.
Tags:
From:
no subject
Trilogy, pffft. Maybe one long movie with an intermission if needed. Nobody does intermissions any more, right? That would have generated talk and made the movie stand out without getting silly.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I think they pulled in a whole bunch of Gandalf's story; stuff we only learned about until MUCH LATER.
But I have no idea how they'll pull it off. I'm interested to see, though.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
When Jackson announced it was going to three movies I was not happy. The book just isn't substantive enough for that. He must be inserting a lot of the backstory from the Appendices.
From:
no subject